Ogenalabs
Decentralized Identity (DID): Reclaiming Control in the Digital Age
Back to Blog
Decentralized Identity
Self-Sovereign Identity
Blockchain
Privacy
Web3
Verifiable Credentials

Decentralized Identity (DID): Reclaiming Control in the Digital Age

July 18, 2024
Richard Nthiwa Mutisya (Co-founder & Lead Researcher)

Decentralized Identity (DID): Reclaiming Control in the Digital Age

In today's digital world, our identities are fragmented across countless online platforms and controlled by third-party providers like social media networks, email services, and government agencies. This centralized model leads to numerous problems: data silos, lack of user control, increased risk of large-scale data breaches, censorship, and difficulty in managing one's own digital footprint. Decentralized Identity (DID), often intertwined with the concept of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), offers a paradigm shift, aiming to put individuals back in control of their own digital identities.

This article explores the core concepts of DIDs and SSI, the underlying technologies like blockchain and Verifiable Credentials (VCs), the benefits they offer, and the challenges to widespread adoption.

The Problem with Centralized Identity

The current identity landscape suffers from several fundamental flaws:

  1. Lack of Control: Users don't own or control their identity data; it's held by service providers who dictate how it's used, shared, and potentially revoked.
  2. Data Silos: Identity information is scattered across different platforms, making it difficult to manage and reuse credentials efficiently. Users repeatedly provide the same information.
  3. Security Risks: Centralized databases are honeypots for attackers. Breaches can expose sensitive information of millions of users.
  4. Privacy Concerns: User activity and data are often tracked and monetized by identity providers without explicit, granular consent.
  5. Exclusion: Dependence on specific providers or government documents can exclude individuals who lack access to these systems.
  6. Censorship & Deplatforming: Centralized platforms can arbitrarily deny access or remove users' accounts and associated digital identities.
graph LR
    subgraph Centralized Identity Model
        U[User] --> P1(Platform 1);
        U --> P2(Platform 2);
        U --> P3(Platform 3);
        P1 -- Stores/Controls --> D1[User Data @ P1];
        P2 -- Stores/Controls --> D2[User Data @ P2];
        P3 -- Stores/Controls --> D3[User Data @ P3];
        P1 <-.-> P2;  // Limited/No Interoperability
        P2 <-.-> P3;
        P1 <-.-> P3;
        X(Attacker) -- Targets --> D1;
        X -- Targets --> D2;
        X -- Targets --> D3;
    end
    style Centralized Identity Model fill:#fcc,stroke:#333

Figure 1: The Fragmented and Vulnerable Centralized Identity Model.

Decentralized Identity (DID) Explained

Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) are a new type of identifier designed to enable verifiable, decentralized digital identity. According to the W3C DID Core specification, a DID is a globally unique, persistent identifier that does not require a centralized registration authority.

Key Properties of DIDs:

  • Decentralization: Creation and management don't rely on central authorities.
  • Persistence: DIDs are designed to be long-lived, controlled by the identity owner.
  • Cryptographically Verifiable: DIDs are associated with cryptographic key pairs, allowing the DID controller to prove control.
  • Resolvability: DIDs can be resolved to a "DID Document."

DID Document: This is a JSON document associated with a DID that contains important metadata, including:

  • Cryptographic public keys (for authentication and encryption).
  • Service endpoints (locations where others can interact with the DID owner, e.g., a personal data store).
  • Verification methods.

DID Methods: The specific mechanism for creating, resolving, updating, and deactivating DIDs and their associated documents. Different DID methods exist, often leveraging specific blockchain ledgers (e.g., did:ethr for Ethereum, did:ion for Bitcoin/IPFS), distributed file systems (IPFS), or other decentralized networks.

// Example Simplified DID Document
{
  "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/did/v1",
  "id": "did:example:123456789abcdefghi", // The DID itself
  "verificationMethod": [
    {
      "id": "did:example:123456789abcdefghi#keys-1",
      "type": "Ed25519VerificationKey2018", // Type of key
      "controller": "did:example:123456789abcdefghi", // Who controls this key
      "publicKeyBase58": "H3C2AVvLMv6gmMNam3uVAjZpfkcJCwDwnZn6z3wXmqPV" // Public key material
    }
    // ... potentially more keys for different purposes
  ],
  "authentication": [
    // Reference to key(s) used for authentication
    "did:example:123456789abcdefghi#keys-1"
  ],
  "assertionMethod": [
    // Reference to key(s) used for issuing credentials
    "did:example:123456789abcdefghi#keys-1"
  ],
  "service": [
    {
      "id": "did:example:123456789abcdefghi#agent",
      "type": "AgentService", // Type of service
      "serviceEndpoint": "https://agent.example.com/did:example:123456789abcdefghi" // Endpoint URL
    }
    // ... other services like identity hubs, personal data stores
  ]
}

Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI)

SSI is a philosophical and practical framework built upon DIDs and related technologies. It emphasizes individual control and autonomy over digital identity. The core principles (often cited from Christopher Allen's "10 Principles of Self-Sovereign Identity") include:

  1. Existence: Users must have an independent existence.
  2. Control: Users must control their identities.
  3. Access: Users must have access to their own data.
  4. Transparency: Systems and algorithms must be transparent.
  5. Persistence: Identities must be long-lived.
  6. Portability: Information and services must be transportable.
  7. Interoperability: Identities should work across different systems.
  8. Consent: Users must agree to the use of their identity.
  9. Minimization: Disclosure of claims must be minimized (selective disclosure).
  10. Protection: The rights of users must be protected.

SSI aims to create an identity layer for the internet where users manage their own credentials and selectively disclose information as needed, without relying on centralized intermediaries.

Verifiable Credentials (VCs)

Verifiable Credentials are a crucial component of the DID/SSI ecosystem. They are tamper-evident digital credentials containing claims (statements) about a subject, issued by an issuer, and held by a holder (usually the subject).

The VC Triangle:

graph TD
    Issuer -- Issues Credential --> Holder;
    Holder -- Presents Credential --> Verifier;
    Verifier -- Verifies Credential --> Issuer; // Verifier checks issuer's DID/keys & credential integrity

    style Issuer fill:#ccf,stroke:#333
    style Holder fill:#cfc,stroke:#333
    style Verifier fill:#fcc,stroke:#333

Figure 2: The Verifiable Credentials Triangle.

Key Features of VCs:

  • Cryptographically Signed: Issued with the issuer's digital signature (linked to their DID), ensuring authenticity and integrity.
  • Tamper-Evident: Any modification to the credential after issuance invalidates the signature.
  • Holder Control: The holder stores and controls their credentials (often in a digital wallet).
  • Selective Disclosure: Holders can often present only specific claims from a credential (using ZKPs or other techniques) rather than revealing the entire document.
  • Machine-Readable: Typically formatted in JSON-LD for interoperability.

Example Use Case:

  1. A university (Issuer) issues a digital diploma (VC) containing claims like "Degree: BSc Computer Science", "Graduation Date: 2024-05-15" to a student (Holder), signed with the university's DID.
  2. The student stores this VC in their digital wallet.
  3. When applying for a job, the student (Holder) presents the VC to a potential employer (Verifier).
  4. The employer (Verifier) can:
    • Verify the issuer's signature using the university's public key found by resolving its DID.
    • Check that the credential hasn't been tampered with.
    • Optionally, check if the credential has been revoked (if a revocation mechanism is used).

This process verifies the claim without the employer needing to contact the university directly for every applicant.

// Simplified Verifiable Credential Example (JSON-LD)
{
  "@context": [
    "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1",
    "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/examples/v1" // Example context
  ],
  "id": "http://example.edu/credentials/1872", // Unique ID for the credential
  "type": ["VerifiableCredential", "UniversityDegreeCredential"], // Types
  "issuer": "did:example:university123", // Issuer's DID
  "issuanceDate": "2024-05-15T10:00:00Z",
  "credentialSubject": {
    "id": "did:example:student456", // Holder's DID
    "degree": {
      "type": "BachelorDegree",
      "name": "BSc Computer Science"
    },
    "university": "Example University"
  },
  "proof": { // Digital Signature
    "type": "Ed25519Signature2018",
    "created": "2024-05-15T10:00:00Z",
    "proofPurpose": "assertionMethod", // Why the proof was created
    "verificationMethod": "did:example:university123#keys-1", // Key used for signing
    "jws": "eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSIsImI2NCI..." // The actual signature value (JWT format often used)
  }
}

Benefits of DID/SSI

  • User Control & Empowerment: Individuals manage their own identity and data.
  • Enhanced Privacy: Selective disclosure and reduced reliance on third-party data aggregation.
  • Improved Security: Reduces attack surface compared to centralized databases; users control private keys.
  • Increased Efficiency: Reusable credentials streamline onboarding and verification processes.
  • Greater Interoperability: Standardized formats (DIDs, VCs) allow credentials to work across different platforms.
  • Reduced Censorship Risk: Identity is not tied to a single platform that can revoke access.
  • Inclusion: Potential to provide digital identity solutions for individuals lacking traditional documentation.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite the promise, widespread adoption faces hurdles:

  1. Key Management: Securely managing private keys is crucial and remains a usability challenge for average users. Loss of keys can mean loss of identity control. Social recovery and multi-sig solutions are being explored.
  2. Usability & User Experience: Interacting with DIDs, wallets, and VCs needs to be as seamless as current login methods (e.g., OAuth, username/password).
  3. Scalability & Cost: Storing DID documents or VC verification information on some blockchains can be expensive or slow. Layer 2 solutions and alternative DID methods (like did:key or did:peer) aim to mitigate this.
  4. Interoperability: While standards exist, ensuring true interoperability between different DID methods, wallets, and verifier systems requires ongoing effort.
  5. Governance: How are DID methods governed? How are disputes resolved? Establishing robust governance for the underlying infrastructure is vital.
  6. Revocation: Implementing efficient and privacy-preserving mechanisms to revoke compromised keys or outdated credentials is complex.
  7. Adoption & Network Effects: Requires buy-in from issuers (universities, governments, employers) and verifiers (service providers) to become truly useful.
  8. Legal & Regulatory Framework: Recognition of DIDs and VCs within existing legal frameworks is still evolving.

Conclusion: The Future of Identity is Decentralized

Decentralized Identity and Self-Sovereign Identity represent a fundamental shift towards a more user-centric, secure, and private internet. By leveraging DIDs, Verifiable Credentials, and blockchain technology, we can build an identity layer where individuals control their digital personas and data. While significant challenges in usability, key management, scalability, and adoption remain, the potential benefits are immense.

DID/SSI can streamline online interactions, reduce fraud, enhance privacy, empower users, and foster new forms of digital trust. As the technology matures and the ecosystem grows, we anticipate DIDs becoming an integral part of Web3 and the future of online identity management. Ogenalabs is actively exploring the potential of DID/SSI, particularly in conjunction with zero-knowledge proofs, to build next-generation applications that prioritize user privacy and control.